This is a very Capitalist argument reflecting the views and interests of monied people. As a Communist I would argue that there are only historical human rights, not universal and inalienable human rights. And I would argue that possession of and right is a function of power by the ruled against the Sovereign, be he a king or a majority of the population. If anyone has a right such as the right to housing it only has a meaning if the Sovereign is obliged to provide it. To the extent that the ruled have real rights it is only the extent of the concessions forced upon the Sovereign by them. If the Sovereign makes tyrannical inroads on historic rights or the interests of the ruled, it is their duty to fight back and hold him to account by despotic inroads on his authority. As regards bodily autonomy this in an abortion regime a female supremacist right won by political struggle and lost by political struggle. The right to life of the unborn child is a right won by proxy by the unborn child and vulnerable to loss also in the course of political struggle throughout history. It is a question of power.
Biological imperative begs to differ. Our entire nervous system acts to protect our inalienable rights.
You do make an excellent case against Communism though, including the false flag of inserting "evil capitalism" claims where it was not even represented or suggested.
One thing we may agree upon is that any government will seek to increase its power and only the will of the people will prevent dictatorship.
This is a very Capitalist argument reflecting the views and interests of monied people. As a Communist I would argue that there are only historical human rights, not universal and inalienable human rights. And I would argue that possession of and right is a function of power by the ruled against the Sovereign, be he a king or a majority of the population. If anyone has a right such as the right to housing it only has a meaning if the Sovereign is obliged to provide it. To the extent that the ruled have real rights it is only the extent of the concessions forced upon the Sovereign by them. If the Sovereign makes tyrannical inroads on historic rights or the interests of the ruled, it is their duty to fight back and hold him to account by despotic inroads on his authority. As regards bodily autonomy this in an abortion regime a female supremacist right won by political struggle and lost by political struggle. The right to life of the unborn child is a right won by proxy by the unborn child and vulnerable to loss also in the course of political struggle throughout history. It is a question of power.
Biological imperative begs to differ. Our entire nervous system acts to protect our inalienable rights.
You do make an excellent case against Communism though, including the false flag of inserting "evil capitalism" claims where it was not even represented or suggested.
One thing we may agree upon is that any government will seek to increase its power and only the will of the people will prevent dictatorship.